Talk:Regionals/2009

-Beautiful idea. We need to put this somewhere. I'm think nationals, as an underlying topic?Stanley Tree 20:30, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks! But why not leave them where they are? Going to the nationals page to look up regionals scores... wouldn't click. Madcap 22:47, 28 October 2009 (UTC)Madcap

How did you calculate the Nebraska team scores? I understand how you extrapolated the individual scores, but I can't figure out how you got the team scores. Also, when you look at Prep and Burke's state scores, both scores listed here are almost 3,000 points lower than the state score. Do you think we should just add 15,000 points for subjectives? This method puts Burke at 46,000 (we scored 47,424 at state after increasing our objectives by about 1,000 points) and Prep at 43,700 (43,xxx at state, don't know what they scored on subjectives), so it seems pretty accurate. Madcap 03:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Madcap

To be honest I don't remember, it was either the 7/10 extrap or the 15k, and since you're saying it wasn't the 15k (which is usually more accurate), then yea it was probably way off.

And I was thinking maybe more of a round-by-round champion table:

2009 Round 1: Whoever(score) round 2: Moorpark (score) Round 3: Moorpark (score) Round 4 is nationals itself, so probably don't need to count that

Thoughts?Stanley Tree 19:22, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

Incredible idea! See my page. Madcap 19:43, 30 October 2009 (UTC)Madcap